Justice independence: foreign constitutional experiences.

  • Sergey Zakharov
  • Alexander Chemshit
  • Alevtina Novikova
  • Nina Stus
  • Tatiana Zajceva.
Keywords: legal principles, principles of justice, independence, judicial power, court

Abstract

This article presents the results of a comparative legal study investigating the norms of constitution in CIS countries, Europe and America about formalizing the principle of justice independence. With respect to this principle, the absence of substantive certainty has been established; fragmentary constitutional consolidation in such semantic aspects is observed as independence of the judiciary or state courts, as well as courts of an autonomous territorial entity in the state, and budget formation of the judicial system (Kyrgyzstan) or the budget of the judiciary is set up.

References

Alan, D. Angus, C. (2001). The Future of the Judicial System of the European Union. Bloomsbury Publishing. 278 p.

Anishina V.I. (2006). Sistema osnovopolagayushchih principov pravosudiya v rossijskom prave // Samostoyatel'nost' i nezavisimost' sudebnoj vlasti Rossijskoj Federacii / pod red. V.V. Ershova. M., 2006. (In Russian)

Buzun E.V., Pasenov A.N., Safronova E.V., Sova N.I., Artamonova V.O. (2017). State Functions: Theoretical and Legal Discourse Analysis // International Journal of Scientific Study. 2017. November. Vol 5. Issue 8. P. 323-326.

Charles, R. (1975). Justice and International Relations. Philosophy & Public Affairs. Vol. 4. # 4. pp. 360-389.

Colin, F. (2007). Justice in Ideal Theory: A Refutation. Political Studies. Volume 55. Issue 4. pp. 844-864.

Lucas, J.R. (1972). Justice. Philosophy.Volume 47. Issue 181. pp. 229-248.

Published
2019-05-01