Evolution and emerging trends in Triple Helix and Entrepreneurship Research: a global perspective
Abstract
This study examines the evolution and current trends in Triple Helix and Entrepreneurship research using advanced bibliometric techniques, analyzing 314 papers published between 2003 and 2023. The study reveals significant growth in scientific output with the United States, the United Kingdom, and China leading in collaboration and citations. The results show an evolution from fundamental concepts to emerging themes such as entrepreneurial ecosystems and open innovation. Key thematic clusters are identified, including innovation and systems, knowledge and university, and entrepreneurship and economic development. The study highlights the interdisciplinary nature of the field and its growing global importance, offering directions for future research at the intersection of the Triple Helix and entrepreneurship
References
Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: an r-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Infometrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Carayannis, E. G. & Campbell, D. F. (2009). 'mode 3' and 'quadruple helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4), 201. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2009.023374
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41-69. https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105
Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Campbell, D. F. J., Meissner, D., & Stamati, D. (2017). The ecosystem as helix: an exploratory theory‐building study of regional co-opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as quadruple/quintuple helix innovation models. R&D Management, 48(1), 148-162. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12300
Ellegaard, O. & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: how great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809-1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix -- University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development. EASST Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 14-19. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2480085
Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109- 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00055-4
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00009-4
Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2017). The triple helix: University–industry–government innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315620183
Farinha, L., Ferreira, J. J., & Gouveia, B. (2016). Networks of innovation and competitiveness: A triple helix case study. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(1), 259-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0218-3
Guerrero, M. & Urbano, D. (2012). The development of an entrepreneurial university. Journal of Technology Transfer 37, 43–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9171-x
Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., & Fayolle, A. (2016). Entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness: evidence from European entrepreneurial universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(1), 105-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9377-4
Klofsten, M., Fayolle, A., Guerrero, M., Mian, S., Urbano, D., & Wright, M. (2019). The entrepreneurial university as driver for economic growth and social change - Key strategic challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.004
Leydesdorff, L. & Meyer, M. (2006). Triple helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems. Research Policy, 35(10), 1441-1449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.016
Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, ..., and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4
Marques, J. P. C., Caraça, J. M. G., & Diz, H. (2006). How can university–industry–government interactions change the innovation scenario in Portugal?—The case of the University of Coimbra. Technovation, 26(4), 534-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.04.005
Sánchez, M. L. (2023). Emprendimiento e Innovación: Indicadores bibliométricos. Revista Venezolana De Gerencia, 28(Edición Especial 10), 1160-1177. https://doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.28.e10.18
Spigel, B. & Harrison, R. (2017). Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1268
Van Eck, N. & Waltman, L. (2009). Software survey: vosviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Singh, A. (2007). Towards an "entrepreneurial university" model to support knowledge-based economic development: The case of the National University of Singapore. World Development, 35(6), 941-958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.05.007
