Evolución y tendencias emergentes en la investigación sobre Triple Hélice y Emprendimiento: una perspectiva global
Resumen
Este estudio examina la evolución y las tendencias actuales en la investigación sobre Triple Hélice y Emprendimiento, utilizando técnicas bibliométricas avanzadas, analizando 314 documentos publicados entre los años 2003 y 2023. El estudio revela un crecimiento significativo en la producción científica con Estados Unidos, Reino Unido y China como líderes en colaboración y citaciones. Los resultados muestran una evolución desde conceptos fundamentales hacia temas emergentes como ecosistemas emprendedores e innovación abierta. Se identifican clústeres temáticos clave, incluyendo innovación y sistemas, conocimiento y universidad, y emprendimiento y desarrollo económico. El estudio destaca la naturaleza interdisciplinaria del campo y su creciente importancia global, ofreciendo direcciones para futuras investigaciones en la intersección de la Triple Hélice y el emprendimiento
Citas
Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: an r-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Infometrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Carayannis, E. G. & Campbell, D. F. (2009). 'mode 3' and 'quadruple helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4), 201. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2009.023374
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41-69. https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105
Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Campbell, D. F. J., Meissner, D., & Stamati, D. (2017). The ecosystem as helix: an exploratory theory‐building study of regional co-opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as quadruple/quintuple helix innovation models. R&D Management, 48(1), 148-162. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12300
Ellegaard, O. & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: how great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809-1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix -- University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development. EASST Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 14-19. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2480085
Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109- 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00055-4
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00009-4
Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2017). The triple helix: University–industry–government innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315620183
Farinha, L., Ferreira, J. J., & Gouveia, B. (2016). Networks of innovation and competitiveness: A triple helix case study. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(1), 259-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0218-3
Guerrero, M. & Urbano, D. (2012). The development of an entrepreneurial university. Journal of Technology Transfer 37, 43–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9171-x
Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., & Fayolle, A. (2016). Entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness: evidence from European entrepreneurial universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(1), 105-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9377-4
Klofsten, M., Fayolle, A., Guerrero, M., Mian, S., Urbano, D., & Wright, M. (2019). The entrepreneurial university as driver for economic growth and social change - Key strategic challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.004
Leydesdorff, L. & Meyer, M. (2006). Triple helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems. Research Policy, 35(10), 1441-1449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.016
Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, ..., and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4
Marques, J. P. C., Caraça, J. M. G., & Diz, H. (2006). How can university–industry–government interactions change the innovation scenario in Portugal?—The case of the University of Coimbra. Technovation, 26(4), 534-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.04.005
Sánchez, M. L. (2023). Emprendimiento e Innovación: Indicadores bibliométricos. Revista Venezolana De Gerencia, 28(Edición Especial 10), 1160-1177. https://doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.28.e10.18
Spigel, B. & Harrison, R. (2017). Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1268
Van Eck, N. & Waltman, L. (2009). Software survey: vosviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Singh, A. (2007). Towards an "entrepreneurial university" model to support knowledge-based economic development: The case of the National University of Singapore. World Development, 35(6), 941-958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.05.007
