Correlación cefalométrica del mentón y cuerpo mandibular en adultos jóvenes andinos, año 2019.
Resumen
Las proporciones áureas faciales son enigmáticas y se encuentran condicionadas subjetivamente a las modificaciones del tercio inferior, debido a que la posición adecuada de los tejidos blandos y el mentón permiten el equilibrio funcional, estético y biológico; por lo tanto, el objetivo de esta investigación fue conocer la posible correlación cefalométrica del mentón y cuerpo mandibular. Se realizó un estudio cuantitativo de tipo correlacional con diseño documentalretrospectivo no experimental, y la muestra fue de 384 radiografías laterales de cráneo en adultos jóvenes Andinos. Los resultados permiten estimar una correlación estadística positiva entre el mentón y cuerpo mandibular; por lo tanto, es posible concluir que el tamaño del mentón es directamente proporcional al tamaño del cuerpo mandibular de adultos jóvenes Andinos.
Citas
Almeida, M. D. de, Farias, A. C. R., & Bittencourt, M. A. V. (2010). Influência do posicionamento sagital mandibular na estética facial. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 15(2), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512010000200012
Arango, A. L. V. (2007). Nuevas dimensiones del concepto de salud: el derecho a la salud en el estado social de derecho.Revista Hacia la Promoción de la Salud,12, 63-78.
Arnett, G. W., & Gunson, M. J. (2004). Facial planning for orthodontists and oral surgeons. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 126(3), 290-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.06.006
Arroyo, H. H., Olivetti, I. P., Lima, L. F. R., & Jurado, J. R. P. (2016). Avaliação clínica para avanço de mento: revisão da literatura e proposta de um algoritmo. In Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology (Vol. 82, Issue 5, pp. 596-601). Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.09.009
Aston, S. J., & Smith, D. M. (2015). Taking It on the Chin: Recognizing and Accounting for Lower Face Asymmetry in Chin Augmentation and Genioplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 135(6), 1591-1595.
Aubá, C. (2002). Belleza y cirugía estética: consideraciones psicológicas y morales. Rev. Med. Univ. Navarra, 46, 45-51.
Basile, F. v., & Basile, A. R. (2017). Prospective Controlled Study of Chin Augmentation by Means of Fat Grafting. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery , 140(6), 1133-1141.
Brian Gibson, F., & Calhoun, K. H. (1992). Chin Position in Profile Analysis: Comparison of Techniques and Introduction of the Lower Facial Triangle. Archives of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery, 118(3), 273-276.
Bruce S. Haskell. D.M.D, P. (1979). The human chin and Its relationship to mandibular morphology (pp. 153-166). https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219
Carneiro, E. N., Pithon, M. M., Machado, A. W., & Braga, E. (2018). Perception of facial profile attractiveness of a brown subject displaying different degrees of lip projection or retrusion, in the city of Salvador/Bahia. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics , 23(2), 62-67.
Celebi, A. A., Tan, E., Gelgor, I. E., Colak, T., & Ayyildiz, E. (2013). Comparison of soft tissue cephalometric norms between Turkish and European-American adults. The Scientific World Journal, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/806203
Cook, T. W. (1933). The human chin and human tooth change. International Journal of Orthodontia and Dentistry for Children, 19(7), 730-734. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0097-0522(33)80010-4
Deffenbacher, K. A., Vetter, T., Johanson, J., & O’Toole, A. J. (1998). Facial aging, attractiveness, and distinctiveness. Perception, 27(10), 1233-1243.
Diago, G. G. (2002). Cirurxía Estética: Photoshop da realidade corporal.Andaina: revista do Movemento Feminista Galego, (32), 25-27.
Fabian, F., & Mpembeni, R. (2004). Sexual dimorphism in the mandibles of a homogenius black population of Tanzania. In Tanzania Journal of Science (Vol. 28, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.4314/tjs.v28i2.18353
Farkas, L. G., Katic, M. J., Hreczko, T. A., Deutsch, C., & Munro, I. R. (1984). Anthropometric proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face in young white adults. American Journal of Orthodontics, 86(1), 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90276-8
Fernández, F., Daniela, K., & López, F. (2019). Acta de Otorrinolaringología & Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello Ángulo de convexidad facial y proyección del mentón en pacientes en postoperatorio de rinoseptoplastia. Angle facial convexity and projection of the chin in patients undergone of rhinoplasty. Odontol. Sanmarquina, 47(1), 47-52. https://doi.org/10.37076/acorl.v47i1.293
Ferreira Nóia, C., Ortega-Lopes, R., Ricardo Loureiro Sato, F., Olate, S., & Mazzonetto, R. (2012). Estudio Radiográfico Prospectivo de la Reparación Ósea en Sínfisis Mandibular Posterior a la Remoción Ósea de Mentón Radiographic Prospective Study of Osseous Repair in Mandibular Symphysis After Chin Bone Remove. In Int. J. Morphol (Vol. 30, Issue 1).
Ferring, V., & Pancherz, H. (2008). Divine proportions in the growing face. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 134(4), 472-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.027
Fink, B., Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (2001). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness in relation to skin texture and color. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115(1), 92-99. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.115.1.92
Franklin, D., O’Higgins, P., & Oxnard, C. E. (2008). Sexual dimorphism in the mandible of indigenous South Africans: a geometric morphometric approach. South African Journal of Science, 104(3-4), 101-106.
Gerstner, G. E., & Fehrman, J. (1999). Comparison of chin and jaw movements during gum chewing. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 81(2), 179-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70246-5
González-Ulloa, M. (1962). Quantitative principles in cosmetic surgery of the face (profileplasty). Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery , 29(2), 186-198.
Harrar, H., Myers, S., & Ghanem, A. M. (2018). Art or Science? An Evidence-Based Approach to Human Facial Beauty a Quantitative Analysis Towards an Informed Clinical Aesthetic Practice. In Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (Vol. 42, Issue 1, pp. 137-146). Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-1032-7
Johnson, A., Wildgoose, D. G., & Wood, D. J. (2002). The determination of freeway space using two different methods. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 29(10), 1010-1013. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00950.x
Kaya, K. S., Türk, B., Cankaya, M., Seyhun, N., & Coşkun, B. U. (2019). Assessment of facial analysis measurements by golden proportion. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology , 85(4), 494-501.
Kiekens, R. M. A., Kuijpers-Jagtman, A. M., van ’t Hof, M. A., van ’t Hof, B. E., & Maltha, J. C. (2008). Putative golden proportions as predictors of facial esthetics in adolescents. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics , 134(4), 480-483.
Mack, M. R. (1991). Vertical dimension: A dynamic concept based on facial form and oropharyngeal function. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry , 66(4), 478-485.
Oguz, O. (1996). The proportion of the face in younger adults using the thumb rule of Leonardo da Vinci. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 18(2), 111-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01795228
Orthlieb, J.-D., Laurent, M., & Laplanche, O. (2000). Cephalometric estimation of Vertical Dimension of Occlusion. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation , 27(9), 802-807.
Pallett, P. M., Link, S., & Lee, K. (2010). New “golden” ratios for facial beauty. Vision Research, 50(2), 149-154.
Park, Y. C., & Burstone, C. J. (1986). Soft-tissue profile-fallacies of hard-tissue standards in treatment planning. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics , 90(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(86)90027-2
Ricketts, R. M. (1982). The biologic significance of the divine proportion and Fibonacci series. American Journal of Orthodontics , 81(5), 351-370.
Schwartz, J. H., & Tattersall, I. (2000). The human chin revisited: What is it and who has it? Journal of Human Evolution, 38(3), 367-409. https://doi.org/10.1006/jhev.1999.0339
Shanahan, T. E. J. (2004). Physiologic jaw relations and occlusion of complete dentures. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 91(3), 203-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.09.001
Taki, Yaqoub, S., &, & Hassan, M. (2018). Legan-burstone soft tissue profile values in a circassian adult sample. Journal of Orthodontic Science, 7(1), 1-5.
Thayer, Z. M., & Dobson, S. D. (2010). Sexual dimorphism in chin shape: Implications for adaptive hypotheses. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 143(3), 417-425.
Tunis, T. S., Hershkovitz, I., May, H., Vardimon, A. D., Sarig, R., & Shpack, N. (2020a). Variation in chin and mandibular symphysis size and shape in males and females: A CT-based study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(12), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124249
Ureta, J. C. (2016). La arquitectura es la forma de una función o la función de una forma. Arquitectura forma y función. Revista Arquitectura, 1(1), 21-22.
Villavicencio Caparó, E. (2018). El tamaño muestral para la tesis. ¿cuántas personas debo encuestar? Odontología Activa Revista Científica, 2(1), 59-62.
