Ciudades amigables y su impacto en la calidad de vida de la población adulta mayor: una revisión sistemática.
Resumen
Las ciudades amigables con los adultos mayores son espacios inclusivos y accesibles cuya finalidad es garantizar la calidad de vida a medida que se envejece. El objetivo del trabajo fue identificar investigaciones que median el impacto de los dominios de las ciudades amigables en la calidad de vida de la población adulta mayor. Se realizó una búsqueda en Web of Science y Scopus utilizando palabras claves en inglés “age friendly cities and quality of life” encontrando 105 artículos. Se utilizó el protocolo PRISMA para la selección y análisis de los artículos. El análisis confirmó que son muy pocos artículos los que abordan la finalidad de las ciudades amigables, el impacto en la calidad de vida de los adultos mayores.
Citas
Adlakha, D., Krishna, M., Woolrych, R., & Ellis, G. (2020). Neighbourhood Supports for Active Ageing in Urban India. Psychology and Developing Sociesties, 32(2), 254–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971333620937497
Aghaei Chadegani, A., Salehi, H., Md Yunus, M. M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of science and scopus databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p18
Aksoy, E., & Korkmaz-Yaylagul, N. (2019). Assessing liveable cities for older people in an urban district in turkey using the analytical hierarchy process. Urban Planning, 4(2TheCityAg), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i2.1943
Alidoust, S., & Bosman, C. (2016). Boomer planning: The production of age-friendly cities. Built Environment, 42(1), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.42.1.107
Bozdag, A., Gümüs, M., Gümüs, K., & Durduran, S. (2017). Accessibility analysis for the elderly in an urban area from Turkey. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, December (Special), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.SI2017.2
Buffel, T., & Phillipson, C. (2018). A Manifesto for the Age-Friendly Movement: Developing a New Urban Agenda. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 30(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2018.1430414
Buffel, T., Rémillard-Boilard, S., Walsh, K., McDonald, B., Smetcoren, A. S., & Donder, L. de. (2020). Age-friendly approaches and old-age exclusion: A cross-city analysis. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 14(2), 89–117. https://doi.org/10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.1470
Davern, M., Winterton, R., Brasher, K., & Woolcock, G. (2020). How Can the Lived Environment Support Healthy Ageing? A Spatial Indicators Framework for the Assessment of Age-Friendly Communities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207685
De Donder, L., Buffel, T., Dury, S., de Witte, N., & Verté, D. (2013). Perceptual quality of neighbourhood design and feelings of unsafety. Ageing & Society, 33, 917–937. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X12000207
Eboreime, E., Ohinmaa, A., Rusak, B., Cassidy, K.-L., Morrison, J., McGrath, P., Uher, R., Meier, S., Fleury, M.-J., Iyer, S. N., Rej, S., Batchelor, F., Levinger, P., Dang, C., Hopwood, M., Acquah, F. N. L., Dzator, J., Tomblin Murphy, G., Warford, J., Agyapong, V. I. O. (2022). The Text4HealthyAging Program: An Evidence-Based Text Messaging Innovation to Support Healthy Urban Aging in Canada and Australia. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, 8, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/23337214221081378
Emirhafizović, M., & Šadić, S. (2018). Ageing in the Urban Context: Evidence from Sarajevo. Socialni Studia/Social Studies, 15(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.5817/soc2018-1-85
Feng, I. M., Chen, J. H., Zhu, B. W., & Xiong, L. (2018). Assessment of and improvement strategies for the housing of healthy elderly: Improving quality of life. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(3), 1– 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU10030722
Flores, R., Caballer, A., & Alarcón, A. (2019). Evaluation of an age-friendly city and its effect on life satisfaction: A two-stage study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(24), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16245073
Hsu, H. C. (2020). Associations of city-level active aging and age friendliness with well-being among older adults aged 55 and over in Taiwan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(12), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124304
Ivan, L., Beu, D., & Hoof, J. van. (2020). Smart and age-friendly cities in romania: An overview of public policy and practice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145202
Kano, M., Rosenberg, P. E., & Dalton, S. D. (2018). A Global Pilot Study of Age-Friendly City Indicators. Social Indicators Research, 138(3), 1205–1227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1680-7
Khoddam, H., Dehghan, M., Sohrabi, A., & Modanloo, M. (2020). The age–friendly cities characteristics from the viewpoint of elderly. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 9(11), 5745–5751. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1098_20
Kort, H., Klimczuk, A., Van, P., Berg, D., Li, M., & Woolrych, R. (2021). Experiences of Older People and Social Inclusion in Relation to Smart ``Age-Friendly’’ Cities: A Case Study of Chongqing, China. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.779913
Makita, M., Woolrych, R., Sixsmith, J., Murray, M., Menezes, D., Fisher, J., & Lawthom, R. (2020). Place (in)securities: older adults´ perceptions across urban environments in the United Kingdom. PsyEcology, 11(2), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2020.1728653
Menezes, D., Woolrych, R., Sixsmith, J., Makita, M., Smith, H., Fisher, J., Garcia-Ferrari, S., Lawthom, R., Henderson, J., & Murray, M. (2021). You really do became invisible: examining older adults right to the city in United Kingdom. Ageing & Society, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X21001793
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ (Online), 339(7716), 332–336. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.B2535
Montoro-Gurich, C., & Moreno-Tapia, C. (2021). The impact of infrastructures for vertical mobility in the quality of life of elderly people: The case study of pamplona. | El impacto de las infraestructuras de movilidad vertical en la calidad de vida de las personas mayores: Pamplona como estudio de ca. Ciudad y Territorio Estudios Territoriales, 53(209), 701–720. https://doi.org/10.37230/CyTET.2021.209.06
Mulliner, E., Riley, M., & Maliene, V. (2020). Older People’s Preferences for Housing and Environment Characteristics. Sustainability, 12, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145723
Ng, S. I., Lim, X. J., & Hsu, H. C. (2021). The importance of age‐friendly city on older people’s continuity and life satisfaction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147252
Nishida, M., Hanazato, M., Koga, C., & Kondo, K. (2021). Association between proximity of the elementary school and depression in Japanese older adults: A cross-sectional study from the jages 2016 survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020500
Noordzij, J. M., Beenackers, M. A., Roux, A. V. D., & van Lenthe, F. J. (2019). Age-friendly cities: Challenges for future research. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 97(6), 436–437. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.18.224865
Paiva, N. M., Daniel, F., Silva, A. G., & Vicente, H. T. (2019). Age-friendly Coimbra, Portugal: perceptions and quality of life in a sample of elderly persons. Ciencia e Saude Coletiva, 24(4), 1473– 1482. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018244.08902017
Pedell, S., Borda, A., Keirnan, A., & Aimers, N. (2021). Combining the digital, social and physical layer to create age-friendly cities and communities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010325
Rémillard-Boilard, S., Buffel, T., & Phillipson, C. (2021). Developing age-friendly cities and communities: Eleven case studies from around the world. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010133
Sánchez-González, D., Rojo-Pérez, F., Rodríguez-Rodríguez, V., & Fernández-Mayoralas, G. (2020). Environmental and psychosocial interventions in age-friendly communities and active ageing: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228305
Santinha, G., & Marques, S. (2015). Built environment, public health and public policies: Understanding institutionalised older people’s behaviour. Saude e Sociedade, 24(3), 1047–1060. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902015135520
Shellae Versey, H., Murad, S., Willems, P., & Sanni, M. (2019). Beyond housing: Perceptions of indirect displacement, displacement risk, and aging precarity as challenges to aging in place in gentrifying cities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(23), 4633– 4654. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234633
Tan, Z., Lau, K. K. L., Roberts, A. C., Chao, S. T. Y., & Ng, E. (2019). Designing urban green spaces for older adults in asian cities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(22), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224423
Van Hoof, J., Kazak, J. K., Perek-Białas, J. M., & Peek, S. T. M. (2018). The Challenges of Urban Ageing: Making Cities Age-Friendly in Europe. International Journal of Enviornmental Research and Public Health, 15, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112473
Vicente, J. M. (2011). Envejecimiento activo (Primera). IMSERSO. http://www.imserso.es
Woo, J., Leung, D., Yu, R., Lee, R., & Wong, H. (2021). Factors Affecting Trends in Societal Indicators of Ageing Well in Hong Kong: Policies, Politics and Pandemics. Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging, 25(3), 325–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-020-1488-z
